Source: U.S. Census report: www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/c2kbr-37.pdf
class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">September 25, 2007: Since the mid-1980s, homeowners have used home
equity lines of credit (HELOCs) to access cash at relatively low interest rates
with certain tax advantages. HELOCs are credit lines extended by a
financial institution to a homeowner based upon the equity in a home.
They have become a source of credit for many homeowners who have experienced
growth in their home's equity in recent years. The credit line debt is
secured by using the home as collateral.
Based on data collected in the 2001 Residential Finance Survey, this brief
profiles the 7.7 million single-family homeowners who had HELOCs in 2001 and
compares them with the 3.4 million who had HELOCs in 1991. We analyzed
characteristics of homeowners with HELOCs and compared them with the 29.8
million single-family homeowners who had other types of mortgages. (These
data apply to single-unit property that these owners both owned and inhabited.)
In addition, the 1.6 million owners whose HELOCs were their only mortgage are
compared with the 6.2 million whose HELOCs were a junior mortgage (i.e., they
also had at least one other mortgage on their property).
HELOCs decrease for home
improvements, increase for debt consolidation.
The main reason for
obtaining a home equity loan in both 2001 and 1991 was to make additions,
improvements, or repairs to the property. The next most popular reason in both
surveys was to consolidate debts. While loans for additions,
improvements, and repairs fell 9 percentage points during the decade (from 54
percent to 45 percent), loans to consolidate debts rose 5 percentage points
(from 21 percent to 26 percent).
Midwest,South, and suburbs had the
most HELOC borrowers.
Over one-half (59 percent)
of owners with HELOCs lived in the Midwest and the South (29 percent
each), 23 percent lived in the Northeast, while 18 percent of HELOC borrowers
lived in the West. The percentage of loans in the Northeast dropped from
about one-third or 35 percent in 1991 to less than one-fourth or 23 percent in
2001, while the percentage of HELOC borrowers in the South increased by 5
percentage points (29 percent in 2001 compared with 24 percent in 1991).
Nationally, most homeowners
with HELOCs (85 percent) lived in metropolitan areas, usually in suburbs (64
percent) rather than in central cities (21 percent). Single-family
homeowners with no HELOCs were less likely to live in metropolitan areas (83
percent) or in the suburbs (58 percent) than homeowners with HELOCs.
The median age of homeowners with HELOCs was
50 years, while the median age of all other mortgaged owners was 46
years. Compared with other mortgaged owners, those with HELOCs also:
• Had a higher median
household income ($68,300 compared with $46,200).
• Were more likely to be
White (91 percent compared with 86 percent) and less likely to be Black (4 percent
compared with 9 percent) or Hispanic (5 percent compared with 9 percent).
• Were more likely to
co-own the property with a person of the opposite sex (72 percent compared with
64 percent).
• Were more likely to have
owned another home before they purchased their current home (64 percent
compared with 56 percent). Age of the building and length of residency in
the home were both higher for HELOC borrowers.
Homeowners with HELOCs
lived in homes that were a median of 27 years old, three years older than the
homes of other mortgaged owners.
Additionally, those with
HELOCs had been living in their homes for a median of 8 years, while other
mortgaged owners had lived in their homes for a median of 5 years.
Mortgage debt was lower and
home value was higher for owners with HELOCs. The median total
outstanding mortgage debt on the property for HELOC borrowers ($87,100) was
lower than for other mortgaged owners ($91,800), while the median value of
their homes was higher ($155,600 compared with $134,400). Homeowners with
HELOCs and those with other types of mortgages had similar median first
mortgage amounts ($88,500 compared with $86,200).
Homeowners 55 years and
older were equally likely to have a HELOC or another type of mortgage.
The survey was expanded in 2001 to include questions on homeowners aged 55 and
older. Among homeowners who lived in a subdivision, a building, or an
immediate neighborhood where most of the residents were aged 55 and older, the
proportion with a HELOC (7 percent) was the same as the proportion with other
types of mortgages. A similar question asked if the property was
restricted to those 55 and older. In this case, more homeowners had
HELOCs (6 percent) than had other mortgages (5 percent). Owners whose
HELOCs were stand-alone mortgages were older.
Owners whose HELOC was
their only mortgage were a median of 60 years old, more than a decade older
than those whose HELOC was a junior mortgage (median age 48). Compared
with owners whose HELOC was a junior mortgage, owners whose HELOC was their
only mortgage also:
• Were less likely to have
owned another home before they bought their current one (57 percent compared
with 66 percent).
• Were less likely to
co-own the property with a person of the opposite sex (62 percent compared with
74 percent).
• Lived in lower-valued
homes (median value of $121,300 compared with $162,800).
• Had lower median
household income ($47,400 compared with $72,900).
• Were more likely to live
in an older home (median age of 37 years compared with median age of 21
years).
• Had lived in their homes
longer (a median of 19 years compared with 3 years). Women were more likely to
have a stand-alone HELOC.
As mentioned previously,
5.5 million of the 7.7 million HELOC borrowers co-owned the property with a
member of the opposite sex. The remaining 2.2 million either coowned with a
member of the same sex or had no co-owner. Fifty-four percent of these 2.2
million owners were women. Of the 1.5 million owners who did not co-own the
property and whose HELOC was a junior mortgage, 52 percent were women.
Among the 537,000 owners
who did not co-own the property and who had stand-alone HELOC's, about
three-fifths were women. The data in this brief were collected by the 2001
Residential Finance Survey (RFS), a survey of about 70,000 residential property
owners, conducted as a follow-up to Census 2000. Results of the survey
are located on the Census Bureau's Web site at www.census
.gov/hhes/www/rfs/rfs.html.
Contacts: Home equity lines
of credit— Linda Cavanaugh 301-763-3199 Census Briefs— Robert Bernstein
301-763-3030
Information on population
and housing topics is presented in the Census 2000 Brief series, located on the
Census Bureau's Web site at www.census.gov/prod/www /abs/briefs.html. For additional
information on housing, including reports and survey data, visit the Census
Bureau's Web site at <www.census.gov/hhes/www.
The data in this release
are based on a sample survey and therefore are subject to both sampling and
nonsampling error. Sampling error is a result of not surveying the entire
population. Nonsampling error occurs because accurate information cannot always
be obtained. The Census Bureau has taken steps to minimize errors and
analytical statements have undergone statistical testing with all comparisons
being significant at the 90-percent confidence level. However, because of
methodological differences, use caution when comparing these data with data
from other sources.